FoolsCap

Instincts are misleading: You shouldn’t think what you’re feeling.

30 January, 2007

Blast!

Filed under: Miscellany

Someone’s been reading my mind again, or at least my blog. . .which might mean the same thing lately.

Anyway, way back when, in my very first post, I had a call out to everyone’s favorite seventeenth century English diarist.  Now someone out there has started transposing Sam Pepys’ diaries into a blog.  No witty commentary here, just a nice little reminder of my early genius.

Haha!  There’s something to be mentioned about blogs and diaries and technological evolution or something.  But I’ll leave that to others.

I remember I remember I remember. . .

Filed under: Pedagogy

. . .when I LOST my MIND!!  I, too, am on occasion obliged to cover the Gnarls Barkley hit "Crazy."

So I found my way to Swivel today.  As the Tour describes it:

Swivel lets you explore data and share your insights with others. Swivel has data about politics, economics, weather, sports, business and more.

Furthermore,

If you’ve ever wondered how two different things are related to one another like happiness and health, crime and poverty, or home prices and climate then you’re a Swiveler at heart. With Swivel, you can compare all kinds of data with a few simple clicks and Swivel will let you know how well the data is related.

If you see something interesting it might just be a coincidence or it could be something more. Comparing data is simple with Swivel so you can try a whole bunch of comparisons until something brilliant comes along.

At first, I admit, this sounded sort of like gimmick, a site that was happily riding on the coattails of the Freakonomics paradigm.  But, after thinking about it, the Swivel model suggests (or maybe recalls) an interesting invention strategy: the assembly of apparently unrelated data into one space as an attempt to make some sense of the relationship between them (and the writer’s relationship to that effort as well).  What I find appealing about Swivel’s explanation of itself is the emphasis on serendipity, luck, and contingency: "you can try a whole bunch of comparisons until something brilliant comes along."  There is no call for or guarantee of certainty or of brilliance, but rather an implication that there is something of value in making the effort to think about these data in context with one another.

Hmm.

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Jay of onefinejay.com